Welcome to Bates
Method at Natural Earth |
Bates Method is a form of natural health and healing
therapy that aims to promote natural health- it is considered an alternative
and natural treatment used to enhance a happy and healthy lifestyle.
William
Horatio Bates
The Bates method is a practice that are claimed
to improve sight and reverse ocular disorders to normal by eliminating
"mental strain" and restoring the "natural habits"
of seeing. It is the backbone of the natural vision improvement
movement , and was first described in 1920 by ophthalmologist William
Horatio Bates in a book entitled Perfect Sight Without Glasses,
then subsequently in his monthly magazine entitled Better Eyesight.
Bates
claimed that various types of "mental strain" were responsible
not only for refractive errors (such as myopia, hyperopia, astigmatism,
and presbyopia), but also for other abnormal eye conditions including
strabismus, cataracts, glaucoma, amblyopia, conjunctivitis, blepharitis,
and diseases of the optic nerve and retina. According to Bates,
"relaxation" was the only cure for each type of strain.

The Most Misunderstood Aspects of the Bates Method by
David Kiesling
FALSE: The Bates Method is a system of exercises targeting the
eye muscles.
The Bates Method is often interpreted as a system of eye exercises.
The notion is that it's about strengthening, toning, stretching,
or otherwise improving the physical conditioning of muscles surrounding
or in the eyes. But this work is oriented around the relief of mental
strain that causes wrong use of the eyes. It's not about exercise
in the physical sense, but a practicing of relaxation. It has to
do with the mental control of seeing, where the underlying problems
lie. Even "shifting," a principle of relaxed seeing and
something that may be practiced in certain ways, is not meant as
a physical exercise; it has to do with relaxed movement, which the
eyes themselves are already quite capable of.
FALSE: Stress causes impaired vision.
This is sometimes just a matter of semantics ("stress"
and "strain" and "tension" are sometimes used
interchangeably), but the concept is important nonetheless. A stressful
situation doesn't cause you to suffer. It's just some outside force
that challenges your ability to handle such a situation without
inducing harm to yourself. This is illustrated by the variety of
ways different people (especially in different cultures) handle
a given situation in completely different ways. We can strain as
a reaction to stress and have all sorts of bodily problems (such
as vision problems), but that reaction isn't caused by the stress
itself. It's caused by us. People with vision problems chronically
strain in some or all situations without even requiring any outside
stress. The unconscious decision to distort, blur, or otherwise
impair our vision isn't necessary.
FALSE: Anyone can relax the eyes at will by just going limp. At
least a little bit of effort is required to see clearly.
The idea that an effort is required to accomplish anything might
seem to make the most sense. Our culture promotes the "no pain,
no gain" mentality that encourages us equate effort with pain
and find a way to suffer in trying to accomplish anything. Here,
it doesn't work that way. Further complicating things, the tensions
associated with mental strain are generally inaccessible to direct
conscious control, or even conscious awaerness if it's chronic enough.
You think you're relaxed, but you're in fact only as relaxed as
you know how to be. Certainly there should be an alert interest
in what is out there, but as far as focusing it should be passive,
simply taking in what comes to it. All effort to see, all straining
to see, needs to be ceased.
FALSE: By making an effort to visualize something seen you can induce
relaxation.

Memory is only perfect when you're relaxed. Making an effort to
bring up a visual memory, or any other kind of memory, is just as
wrong as an effort to see, for memory only works well passively.
By efforts you might be able to form a vague picture in your mind,
but it will always be lacking, just as the sight can be improved
partially and temporarily by straining but can't be brought to normal
in that way. A perfect memory is a feature of a mind perfectly relaxed
and can't exist otherwise. Bates likened it to the steam gauge of
an engine (1); the gauge is only an indicator and has nothing to
do with the means whereby a change takes place. The usefulness of
memory in the Bates Method lies in the fact that when you are able
to remember something perfectly, you must necessarily have relaxed
first, since the efficiency of the mind is impaired so much by strain.
You may not consciously know how to relax, but if you know how to
remember something perfectly, that'll do it. By continuing the memory
of it, you're continuing the practice of relaxation.
FALSE: By closing the eyes and trying to see a perfect black, you
can induce relaxation.
This has to do with the same principles as memory, the blackness
of the visual field being like a steam gauge. If, while looking
at your visual field with your eyes closed (or by paying no attention
to the field, or by whatever means you choose), you manage to relax,
causing it to appear blacker, great. But trying it can also lead
to strain. If you try to make the various blobs of color that you
may see with your eyes closed disappear, you're likely to just be
straining more. The relaxation comes first, before the blackness,
not after.
FALSE: Central fixation is narrowing the focus down to see one
tiny part of something to the exclusion of everything else. Sometimes
you need to stop central fixation in order to see a car or a hill,
rather than just its parts.
The principle of central fixation refers to the ability to see
the point regarded better than anything else around it, whether
immediately next to it or a good distance away. Central fixation
is an expansive awareness, not a narrowing of it. A lack of central
fixation includes the central point of focus being larger than it
should and also the field of total awareness being narrowed. Central
fixation is how the mind works when at rest, with a central point
of awareness surrounded by a field of increasing vagueness. The
central point of attention moves rapidly, taking in a lot, faster
than you can be conscious of. This only occurs to its greatest degree
when your eyes are relaxed, in which case you can't even feel the
movement. You can still see an entire large object in this way,
or think you do; It may appear all clear at once, but much of it
is only your memory of having seen various parts of it clearly an
instant before. Things are still somewhat clear a little outside
of your center of sight, providing the illusion of normal sight
that things can be seen clearly all at once. On the other hand,
if you're straining, you may hold your eyes in a fixed position
and make efforts to see an entire object (large or small) clearly,
without allowing your eyes to move and take in what they can without
interference.
FALSE: Central fixation must be consciously practiced in order
to avoid seeing a large part of the visual field equally clear.
Central fixation is the result of seeing in a passive way, letting
things come into focus instead of making an effort to bring them
into focus. When you allow yourself to do that, central fixation
merely describes the natural way of seeing, the easiest possible
way of seeing. There's no need to worry about seeing too much of
your visual field clearly, because you can't do it. Either the image
seen will be blurry over a large area, or it will consist of one
part clearest at a time. One of many things that can be practiced
is noticing details. You can make conscious or unconscious efforts
to do it, and cause yourself discomfort, but when you stop all effort,
there is no danger of losing central fixation. It's the natural
state, not something that must be maintained. It isn't something
that's practiced and then which you take a rest from. It's rest
in itself. If it's tiring and you need a rest after doing it, it
isn't central fixation at all.
FALSE: If Bates's theory of accommodation is wrong, the whole Method
is disproven.

Bates's theory of accommodation (the mechanism by which the eye
adjusts to see a near object) is a common target for critics. While
I myself believe he is probably at least partly correct about the
matter, the exact workings of the eye is of no consequence in the
practice and experience of the Bates Method. It may be good to forget
about the eyes altogether, however evasive that may sound to the
physically-minded. Rather than the basis of the Bates Method being
formed by a scientific model, the basis is formed by readily observable
principles that make up the art of seeing. It's experiential, not
theoretical. Aldous Huxley noted that seeing is an art and does
not rise or fall under any particular physiological explanation.
Kevin Wooding, a Bates teacher in Oxford, put it well when he said,
"Every argument against the method misses the essential parts
of it - the principles of good eye use, and understanding good eye
use is better experienced than theorized," and "it's in
the practice and experience of the Bates Method which makes it instantly
clear that the orthodox theory has to be wrong." The conventional
way of treating vision tends to disregard the mental side of seeing
and assumes that in the absence of disease the visual system is
always in perfect working order, apparently being different from
every other part of the body in that respect.
FALSE: If you get plenty of sleep and general rest, you don't need
to spend even more time learning to relax.
Surprisingly, Bates found that most people strain when they sleep
(2). Those with imperfect sight strain while asleep to a greater
degree than when they are awake, and even those with perfect sight
usually strain while asleep as well. It is obviously possible not
to, but only relaxation during sleep doesn't really help encourage
a chronically tense person to maintain relaxation during conscious
hours, if additional practice isn't put in during the day. Everybody
relaxes now and then, so it's just a matter of learning to stay
relaxed while actively doing things.
FALSE: The swing, or variations such as the long swing, is the
act of swinging your body, head, or eyes back and forth.
This is important not just for clarification on Dr. Bates's definitions.
Thinking of the swing as something we do conceals a major aspect
of the Bates method. The illusion of oppositional movement is the
swing, not what you do to produce it. Turn left, and everything
appears to swing to the right. Turn right, and everything appears
to swing to the left. The point of the swing is noticing the illusion
of movement and letting it continue. The point is not in moving
your eyes per se.
Citations: 1. Bates, W.H.
"Memory as an Aid to Vision." 2. Bates, W.H. The Cure
of Imperfect Sight by Treatment Without Glasses. New York: Central
Fixation Publishing Co., 1920. 77.

Click
here to read more about Bates Method
PLEASE NOTE: Natural-Earth.com
does not necessarily endorse any of the natural health and healing
treatments and therapy in the natural health, natural medicine and
lifestyles directory. The material on this web site has been provided
for your information and we urge you to be discriminating in making
your choice of natural health and healing. We wish you Good Luck...
and Good Health.
|